Evening Ethics Discussions
- May 31: “Are U.S. physicians complicit in unethical organ harvesting when they provide surgical education to international transplant physicians?”
- April 19: A GENETICS HOT TOPICS: Genetic Testing and Disability: Is Genetic Testing Discriminatory?
- April 7: A Special Evening Ethics Collaboration with The Association for Utah Genetic Counselors: “White People”: A staged Reading and Panel Discussion on Race, Religion, and Disability
- March 22: "Whose Story to Tell? The Ethics of Physicians Writing Their Experience" with 2017 Cowan Memorial Lecturer, Jay Barch, MD
- February 15: “My patient has a DNAR order and needs an operation: What should I do?” with 2017 David Green Memorial Lecturer, Mary E. Fallat, MD
- January 25: "Is Proxy-Witnessing an Ethical Way to Remember the Holocaust and Prevent Future Atrocities?"
The death last July of Elie Wiesel, 87, a Holocaust survivor and winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, was a reminder that soon, there will be no eyewitnesses still living. How then do we heed what has been called humanity's "ethical imperative" to not forget so that the atrocities of the Holocaust will never reoccur in the future?
Literature scholar Susan Gubar suggests in her book Poetry after Auschwitz: Remembering What One Never Knew (2003), the possibility of "proxy-witnessing." Writers who did not participate in the Holocaust "testify…for those who cannot testify for themselves" by exercising their moral imagination. Through poetry's images and words, emotion and intellect, readers are transported to a communal memory of the past and then returned to the present where they may ethically look to the future. Proxy-witnessing may be applicable to other artistic mediums as well. Photography in particular has been discussed in relation to memory and representation. So, too, has tourism to Holocaust memorials, museums, and monuments; visitors are "secondary witnesses" and "producers of collective memory, historical knowledge, and ethical reflection" (Reynolds 2016).
Our discussion will begin with contributions from the University of Utah community. Jeff Botkin, M.D., M.P.H., associate vice president for research integrity and chief of the Division of Medical Ethics and Humanities, and Susan Folsom, a fourth-year medical student, both visited Auschwitz last summer with the program Fellowships at Auschwitz for the Study of Professional Ethics. We also will discuss the title poem, "Conversations with Survivors," from a collection by Jacqueline Osherow, Ph.D., U of U distinguished professor of English, whose writing is included in Gubar's book.
Osherow, Jacqueline. Conversations with Survivors. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 1994. (a selection from)
Reed, Brian M. "Poetry after Auschwitz: Remembering What One Never Knew." Rev. of Poetry after Auschwitz: Remembering What One Never Knew, by Susan Gubar. MLQ (September 2006): 411-16.
Additional optional readings:
Reynolds, Daniel. "Consumers or witnesses? Holocaust tourists and the problem of authenticity." Journal of Consumer Culture, 16(2), 334-353.
Gubar, Susan. Poetry after Auschwitz; Remembering What One Never Knew. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2003.
“My patient has a DNAR order and needs an operation: What should I do?” with 2017 David Green Memorial Lecturer, Mary E. Fallat, MD
Decisions to limit resuscitation efforts or to not attempt resuscitation on behalf of a child are carefully deliberated and thoughtfully made by family members and guardians with the understanding that they can be changed as needed. An opportunity for change arises if the child needs sedation, anesthesia, or surgery. This opportunity should not prompt an automatic discontinuation of the orders, but a required reconsideration of the choice to continue, discontinue, or amend the orders. These are not typically emergency situations and this should be a team effort such that the family has access to the full range of providers and support services needed to make a decision. This is a time when patient and family centered care should be at the forefront of the medical care provided to the family unit, particularly the patient who has a life limiting condition and wishes to die with dignity.
Please join us to discuss these and other questions:
- What would be your approach if a child needed surgery and had a DNAR?
- What are the differences between goal and procedure directed orders and their effects on the decisions made by providers during a procedure?
- If a person with resuscitation limits dies in the operating room or in the PICU during a procedure, should the death be viewed as a sentinel event?
Selected readings: (email email@example.com for copies)
- Fallat ME, Deshpande JK: Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders for Pediatric Patients Who Require Anesthesia and Surgery. Pediatrics. 114(6):1686-1692, 2004
- Walker RM. DNR in the OR: resuscitation as an operative risk. JAMA. 1991;266:2407-2412
- Redmann AJ, Brasel KJ, Alexander CG, Schwarze ML. Use of advance directives for high-risk operations: a national survey of surgeons. Ann Surg. 2012 Mar;255(3):418-23 doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31823b6782
"Whose Story to Tell? The Ethics of Physicians Writing Their Experience" with 2017 Cowan Memorial Lecturer, Jay Barch, MD
How should physician/writers negotiate their dual and dueling obligations when writing about the medical experience, that is, honoring their obligations to put patients first and to protect their privacy and confidentiality, while honoring the writer's duty to his or her creative work and, ultimately, to the reader. Background Reading for this session: http://www.medpagetoday.com/publichealthpolicy/ethics/50943
A Special Evening Ethics Collaboration with The Association for Utah Genetic Counselors: “White People”: A staged Reading and Panel Discussion on Race, Religion, and Disability
The Association for Utah Genetic Counselors is hosting an education conference. The kickoff event is a staged reading by Salt Lake Acting Company of J.T. Rodger’s play, “White People”, followed by a panel and audience discussion reflecting on the themes of race, religion, and disability, facilitated by Dr. Gretchen Case. The Division of Medical Ethics and Humanities is co-hosting this Friday evening event and invites you to join thisEvening Ethics Discussion.
What is cultural humility? How do health care professionals handle offensive comments related to race or religion? How should they? And what role do their colleagues have? How do we separate the professional and the personal?
Please RSVP to firstname.lastname@example.org if you are interested by March 31, 2017 since space is limited. There will be a separate sign-in sheet at the registration table for friends of the DMEH. Registration begins at 6pm and the staged reading of “White People” begins promptly at 6:30pm. Panel begins at 7:15pm.
If you are interested in more information about the AUG conference, go to https://www.utahgc.org/events/2017-education-conference.
Prospective parents with heritable disabilities may encounter many ethical questions about their roles and responsibilities as prospective parents. Sometimes, these questions are framed as questions about whether it is ethically permissible to select for disability, as in discussions about parents who are Deaf choosing to try to select for children who are Deaf. Sometimes, the questions are framed as whether it is permissible to select against disability; Adrienne Asch, for example, was generally committed to procreative liberty but criticized abortion specifically for disability as discriminatory. Another set of questions challenges people with disabilities as parents: they may be faced with criticisms about their abilities as parents and about themselves as procreators. They may also be urged to consider pre- or post-implantation genetic testing to try to avoid passing on their conditions to offspring. These kinds of questions may be posed by family and friends, implicitly or explicitly in public policy, or even in encounters with health care professionals. How should we answer these and related questions? Are they discriminatory, or otherwise ethically problematic, and why? Join us for a discussion facilitated by Visiting Scholar Adam Cureton and Leslie Francis. Adam is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at the University of Tennessee. Prior to that, he did his Ph.D. in Philosophy at UNC Chapel Hill and received a B.Phil. in Philosophy from Oxford University, where he studied as a Rhodes Scholar. His interests are mainly in ethical theory, the history of ethics, political philosophy and metaethics. He writes widely on issues of disability and is founder and president of the Society for Philosophy and Disability. Adam has a visual disability and is the parent of two young children.
Adam Cureton, Some advantages to having a parent with a disability. Journal of Medical Ethics 42, 1. Available here: http://jme.bmj.com/content/42/1/31
Sheila Black, Passing My Disability on to my Children. The New York Times (Sept. 7, 2016). Available here: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/07/opinion/passing-my-disability-on-to-my-children.html?_r=2
“Are U.S. physicians complicit in unethical organ harvesting when they provide surgical education to international transplant physicians?”
Although organ trafficking and transplant tourism have raised ethical questions for many years, recent events have heightened concerns. In February 2017, the British Medical Journal retracted an article about a Chinese liver transplantation study after the authors "failed to persuade editors that 564 livers grafted in the course of the research were not taken from executed prisoners." An Australian researcher had alerted BMJ editors of the "statistical improbability" that so many livers could have been freely donated. The Vatican also held a Pontifical Academy of Science Summit on Organ Trafficking and Transplant Tourism in February. The international group Doctors Against Forced Organ Harvesting (DAFOH) reported that in China "anywhere between 100,000 and 1 million prisoners of conscience have been killed for their organs in the past 17 years." A majority of the prisoners are practitioners of Falun Gong, a spiritual practice that the Communist Party illegally banned in 1999 and continues to persecute heavily. However, other minority populations are also targets of alleged organ trafficking, including Uyghurs, Tibetans, and House Christians. Despite the Chinese Communist Party attempting to say the practice has stopped, there is no evidence to support this claim.
Leading our Evening Ethics Discussion will be Glynn Weldon Gilcrease, M.D., U of U assistant professor of oncology, who serves as deputy director of DAFOH. He has worked closely with David Matas, a Canadian lawyer specializing in refuge law and co-author with David Kilgour of Bloody Harvest: The Killing of Falun Gong for Their Organs (2009), which has been made into a documentary. Questions we'll discuss include:
- What are the ethical ramifications of organ trafficking and transplant tourism for U.S. physicians?
- Are health-care professionals obligated to care for patients who receive an organ transplant in a country that is suspected of illicit organ trafficking?
- Should U.S. surgeons adopt prohibitions similar to Australia and Taiwan, which do not provide surgical education to Chinese physicians?
Sharif A etal. “Organ Procurement From Executed Prisoners in China,” Am Journal Transplant 2014; XX: 1-7.
Matas, David. “Ethical standards and Chinese organ transplant abuse,” (Revised remarks for a presentation to the Department of Bioethics and Medical Humanism, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, 15 April, 2016)
**Contact email@example.com for copies of these articles